The consultation begins. Have your say!

Lichfield District Council’s consultation on Local Plan Allocations began on Monday March 20th. It is important that we make our voice heard on the planning process and proposals for Burntwood.

Full details can be found on www.lichfielddc.gov.uk/allocations and events are being held at halls around Burntwood, Lichfield, Shenstone and beyond.

Our local exhibitions will be held at the Old Mining College Centre on..

3 April from 3.30pm to 6.30pm.

10 April from 10.00am to 1.00pm

There is a permanent display at Burntwood library now until the end of the consultation which has a poster, information, allocations and policies plus maps.

Remember that all comments and feedback must have been received before Friday 12 May 2017.

Please print and post the following documents. These have been prepared so that you can give your feedback easily. The consultation period is for 8 weeks and it is very important that residents use our BAG response letter below. We wish to collect and collate the responses centrally to ensure that the number of Action Group responses can be confirmed.

The following Residents Response can be posted or dropped in to…

35 Farewell Lane
Burntwood
Staffordshire

Download links…

Everyone over the age of 18 can submit their response.

 

 

The Public Consultation on the Lichfield District Council (LDC) Local Plan Land Allocations document starts on Monday 20th March and ends on 12th May.

 

This document contains plans to build 80 homes between Coulter Lane and the St Matthews estate and 250 homes south of Highfields Road, Chasetown, BOTH IN THE GREEN BELT.

 

At the LDC Cabinet Meeting on Tuesday 7th March the Hammerwich and Burntwood Councillors made passionate pleas for these proposals to be removed from the document before the public consultation but their motion was defeated by 5 votes to 2.

 

Burntwood and Hammerwich Action Groups, Burntwood Town Council and Hammerwich Parish Council will now work together, along with thousands of like-minded residents, to make Lichfield District Council change its Plan.

 

All four organisations believe that LDC Planners have not made sufficient effort to make old, unsightly, dilapidated industrial land available for housing. Instead they have taken the easy option of succumbing to developers’ requests to remove valuable, attractive land out of the Green Belt. If this precedent is established all of the Green Belt surrounding Burntwood will be threatened in the future. Reclaiming previously developed brownfield sites will remove eyesores and allow desperately needed affordable homes to be built.

 

We believe that most of Burntwood’s residents value our green surroundings and will want to join our campaign to protect it. Equally we believe they want a more attractive Burntwood with the facilities that a settlement the size of Burntwood deserves. Pushing its boundary further into surrounding countryside would only make things worse.

 

Attached to this document is a letter of response to the Consultation on LDC’s Local Plan Land Allocations document. We urge you to complete it with your address, full name and signature and return it to the volunteer who delivered it (they will provide details of a collection time). Please also add your own comments on the back of the response letter.

 

Thank you if you have signed the “Protect our Green Belt” petition online or emailed Helen Fisher, Burntwood’s Cabinet member, with your concerns. Now, however, a large number of individual responses to the Consultation will be needed to convince the Inspector of the strength of the case to retain all of Burntwood’s Green Belt.

 

You can also respond:

 

WE NEED EVERYONE IN BURNTWOOD AND HAMMERWICH

TO STAND UP TO LICHFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL

PLEASE HAVE YOUR SAY

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

Burntwood Action Group – Press Release

Press release from Burntwood Action Group regarding Lichfield District Council Cabinet Meeting 7th March 2017

“A Better not Bigger Burntwood”

Quoting these words from a concerned Burntwood resident Councillor Helen Fisher ended her impassioned address to the Cabinet of Lichfield District Council at their Meeting on Tuesday evening (7th March).

Following an equally impassioned address from Hammerwich Councillor Doug Pullen, Cllr Fisher was trying to persuade her Cabinet colleagues to modify the Local Plan Land Allocations document before it was put out for public consultation at the end of March.

Councillor Fisher stated that she was representing the views of the many Burntwood residents who had emailed her and the 900 who had signed a “Protect our Green Belt” petition demanding that the Allocations document should not plan to destroy attractive Green Belt sites when dilapidated, underused Brownfield sites, could house all the homes which Burntwood will need in the foreseeable future.

She went on to say “There are many common threads running through the emails I’ve been sent including the obvious infrastructure issues, road condition, traffic & speeding problems, local parking restrictions, lack of shops, worries about school places & traffic issues around schools, wildlife & environment issues, sewerage & drainage problems BUT the one that everyone mentions is that we are being let down by our lack of health care provision. It can take at least 2/3 weeks to get to get a doctor’s appointment and when you do get one some people are missing them because they can’t park!”

When questioned about the efforts made to bring one large Brownfield site forward for housing one of the Planning Officer’s hesitant response made it clear that minimal effort had been made. Residents now assume that Planners have succumbed to pressure from developers and taken the easy option of taking land out of the Green Belt instead.

In response to Councillor Fisher’s question about the number of new homes (1350) planned for Burntwood. Planning Officers stated that they were sticking rigidly to numbers determined in the Local Plan Strategy (2015). They stated that Burntwood, being a sustainable settlement will: “have to accept this number and Green Belt will have to be allocated if enough previously used land cannot be found.” Burntwood Action Group feels that this rigidity is ridiculous when there are many other suitable Brownfield sites throughout Lichfield District which are more sustainable than the site, close to Christ Church, Burntwood, which the Allocations plan proposes to remove from the Green Belt.

Councillor Fisher’s motion to modify the Local Plan Allocations document before putting it out to public consultation was defeated by 5 votes to 2.

Burntwood Action group is now planning how it can best help residents respond to the Consultation at the end of March. It is determined to show that there is sufficient previously used land to accommodate all the houses which Burntwood needs and persuade many thousands of residents to oppose plans to build houses on attractive Green Belt. It feels confident that a huge majority of Burntwood residents want a better not bigger Burntwood.

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

Our latest newsletter

Massive support for campaign to protect Burntwood’s Green Belt

A great big THANK YOU to the 265 local residents who showed overwhelming support at our public meeting on Tuesday 31st January.

Also very many thanks to the Burntwood’s Town Councillors who have pledged support for our campaign. The Action Group is non-party political and we are delighted to see such a high degree of cross-party support.

With so many people prepared to give their time and effort and the £520 generously donated we will be able to mount an even bigger campaign than the successful one 9 years ago.

The two threatened areas of Green Belt are at opposite corners of the Burntwood conurbation. Therefore there will be two prongs to our campaign: Ourselves fighting for the land either side of Coulter Lane and the Chasetown arm fighting to retain the Green Belt south of Highfields Road.  Two prongs, one united front.

If you haven’t already done so please email Helen Fisher <[email protected]>, Leader of Burntwood Town Council and Cabinet Member of Lichfield District Council, to say why you don’t want Burntwood to lose any more of its Green Belt. She needs evidence of the strength of our support to present to the Cabinet. Head your email “Burntwood Green Belt.”

Currently we are:

  • working with local landowners and residents to find additional brownfield sites which can be used for housing. Hopefully we can persuade LDC planners to work with us and abandon plans to build on the Green Belt.
  • lobbying all local Councillors serving on Lichfield District Council to forcefully represent our case at forthcoming Council Meetings.
  • preparing for the possibility that the Local Plan Allocations document, to be published at the end of March, will be little changed from the draft and still contain plans for housing on our Green Belt. During the 6-8 week Consultation we aim to get many thousands of Burntwood’s residents to complete a pre-prepared letter of objection to the Plan. A team of volunteers is being assembled to distribute and collect these letters.
  • having large “SAVE OUR GREEN BELT” signs printed. They can be purchased for £7.50 from Vic Chamberlain, 35 Farewell Lane for display at the front of your property.

We also appreciate Peter Harris’s “Protect our Green Belt” petition and those of you who have signed it. However, when the consultation arrives, letters of objection will carry far more weight.

To come:

Tuesday 7th March Lichfield District Council Cabinet Meeting.    Agenda item:

Endorse the Local Plan Allocations for a minimum of six weeks public consultation.”

We look to our two Burntwood Town Councillors in the LDC Cabinet to pressure their Cabinet Colleagues to remove the proposal for housing on Burntwood’s green belt from the consultation.

IF THEY CAN’T THE FIGHT IS ON

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

Burntwood Action Group Public Meeting – A huge response


Thank you to all who attended the public meeting this evening. Hundreds of concerned residents from across Burntwood, Hammerwich and beyond turned up to show their support.

– You can email Councillor Helen Fisher simply by clicking here. This should open your email client and send to [email protected].

– Your support is crucial to the campaign, and once the consultation begins we will be in touch with letters for you to sign so that we can respond in a strong and coordinated manner.

– If you have anything that can help with the campaign, any suggestions or questions, please do email Vic Chamberlain on [email protected].

– Thank you once again for everyone who attended tonight. We will take your questions and concerns forward as part of the campaign. Please do check back often or sign up to our newsletter with the “Keep up to date” section on the right-side of the site.

image

image

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

A request to Burntwood Town Council

Following the Burntwood Town Council Meeting on Thursday 26th January, Burntwood Action Group has issued the following..

 

STATEMENT/REQUEST FROM BURNTWOOD ACTION GROUP

Madam Chairman, Councillors

Burntwood Action Group, on behalf of the resident of Burntwood, seek Burntwood Town Councils help in preventing Lichfield District Councils planned serious loss of substantial areas of “greenbelt” in Coulter Lane and Highfields Road, to housing.

The LDC Local Plan – July 2012 allocated 1350 homes to be built on “brownfield land” in Burntwood over approximately 20 years.

Unfortunately now the LDC Plan Allocations document [ which is now in the public domain] has identified a shortfall of 694 homes.

This is largely because of the apparent inability to bring forward the planned homes on the brownfield site at Mount Road Industrial Estate.

Burntwood Action Group are fully aware that the LDC Allocation document does not go out for public consultation until the end of March/early April.

However prior to the consultation process commencing, the Allocations Consultation document is to be approved by the LDC Cabinet and the LDC Council

In this respect we believe that our Councillors can make representations at the forthcoming Lichfield District Council Cabinet and at the LDC Council meetings to modified the document prior the commencement of the consultation.

On the grounds that any building on greenbelt is unacceptable as it’s totally against Burntwood Town Council’s stated policy.

This is further reinforced by continued lack of infer-structure in Burntwood.
In particular our local Schools are full to capacity, Our Health Centres are not coping, and our roads are totally inadequate to cater for the current traffic and our Sewage/`drainage systems are operating at capacity.

Further more the proposed building of homes on greenbelt land, will be very detrimental the local fauna & flora, as outlined on Burntwood Action Groups website.

But more importantly any building on “greenbelt its totally against the wishes of Burntwood’s residents

Burntwood Action Group are so concerned with the current threat, that we have requested a meeting with the Leader of the Council and the Chairman of the Planning Committee.

This is in order to ensure they fully understand the implications of the LDC Allocations document and the weight of public feeling to the proposed green belt development.

Burntwood Action Group believe It’s worth noting that 2 of Burntwood Town Councillor make up 25% of the LDC Cabinet and that 14 of our Councillors serve on the Lichfield District Council. This means that Burntwood is well represented at both levels in the District Council to ensure that the wishes of the Burntwood’s residents are properly represented.

Our Councillors should also note, that reports in the National Press are indicating, that Government Ministers are preparing to abandon plans to release greenbelt land for housing

Burntwood Action Group will again be campaigning to save Burntwood’s greenbelt and to that end we have called a public meeting to be held on Tuesday 31st January. It would be nice to be able to advise concerned residence at that meeting that we had the support of Burntwood Town Council and that Councillors have undertaken to be pro-active all levels within the Town and District Councils.

We appeal to our Town Council not to allow Burntwood to sleepwalk into this unwanted significant erosion of our precious greenbelt. If we do, we all will be responsible for loosing a major part of Burntwood’s unique character.

We look forward to confirmation of your support

Thank you.

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

Tuesday 31st January – Join us and learn more

Anyone interested in learning more and possibly joining our renewed campaign please come to the PUBLIC MEETING at:

St Matthews Social Club on Tuesday 31st January 7.30 p.m.

A draft of Lichfield District Council (LDC)’s Local Plan Allocations document is now in the public domain. Extracts of the parts relevant to Burntwood and its Green Belt are printed below. Sites highlighted in brown were previously industrial land and those in green are on land which LDC proposes to take out of the Green Belt.

Policy B1: Burntwood Housing Land Allocations

Along with the Strategic Development Allocations identified within the Local Plan Strategy the following sites, shown on the adopted local plan policies map, are allocated for residential development within the Plan period, subject to the ‘Key Development Considerations’ set out below. ‘Key Development Considerations’ are not all encompassing, other matters may arise during the planning application process that applicants will need to address.


Changes to the Green Belt boundary will be made to the south of Burntwood to accommodate the residential allocation (Site B14) to assist in meeting the housing requirement for Burntwood.

Changes to the Green Belt boundary will be made to remove the St Matthews estate from the Green Belt, as set out in Policy Burntwood 1: Burntwood Environment (Local Plan Strategy) and accommodate residential allocations (Site B15) to assist in meeting the housing requirement for Burntwood.

Site B14 (Burntwood 14): Land south of Highfields Road

Site area (Ha): 11.8
Approximate dwelling yield: 250

The site is currently in agricultural use and is located to the south of Burntwood immediately adjacent to residential development on its northern and western boundaries. To the south of the site is the M6 Toll which provides a significant barrier between Burntwood and the major urban area. To the west of the site beyond Burntwood Bypass is Chasewater Country Park.

Key development considerations:

The SFRA identifies that the site is adjacent to areas of high flood risk (Flood Zone 2 & 3) although the site itself is in Flood Zone 1. Consequently consideration and implementation of suitable measures to manage the potential impacts of flooding and to manage surface water run off.

Potential ecological impacts should be considered due to the greenfield nature of the site and its proximity to designated sites.

Potential measures to mitigate the impacts of road noise from the M6 Toll to the south of the site.

Scheme should be designed to take account of the edge of settlement location and manage the transition from urban to rural. Areas of open space to the south of the site will remain within the Green Belt and must be designed to maintain the openness of the Green Belt.

Site B15 (Burntwood 15): Land east of Coulter Lane, St Matthews 

Site area (Ha): 3.3
Approximate dwelling yield: 80

The site is primarily in agricultural use and is located between to the built up area of St Matthews estate to the east and Coulter Lane to the west.

Key development considerations:

Potential ecological impacts should be considered due to the greenfield nature of the site and its proximity to designated sites.

Scheme should be designed to take account of the edge of settlement location and manage the transition from urban to rural.

Tree preservation orders within the site boundary will need to be considered and accommodated within the design of any proposals.

Summary of the development of the Local Plan over the past 5 years and our concerns:

  • The Inspector of the Local Plan Strategy asked for changes to the Plan to meet the need for additional homes. This resulted in the number of new homes planned for Burntwood (in period 2008 – 2029) to be increased to 1350. Allowing for homes already built and those being built or planned there is a shortfall of 656 homes (Total shortfall for District: 1827).
  • LDC commissioned a Supplement to the Green Belt Review to find sites for the additional homes. This Supplement divided all the Green Belt around existing settlements into parcels of land and assessed each one, for their importance to the Green Belt, against certain criteria. Of the nine parcels around Burntwood all were classed as important except one: Burntwood E1, the parcel bordered by Coulter Lane, Nether Lane, Rugeley Road and Church Road.
  • We deemed the criteria to be severely flawed and their application so prejudiced as to make the Review worthless. It appeared to us that the criteria and their application had been written to identify previously chosen land to be classed as being of only moderate importance to the Green Belt. 
  • In our response to the consultation on the Modifications of the Local Plan Strategy we made detailed objections to this Supplement to the Green Belt Review and its use to classify Burntwood E1 as of only moderate importance to the Green Belt
  • In its consultation (Autumn 2016) on the proposed content of its Local Plan Land Allocations document LDC invited interested parties to comment on the proposals. In the list of “Issues to be addressed by that document was: “Consideration of Green Belt boundaries including the integration of the developed area of the former St Mathews hospital into Burntwood and development needs beyond the plan period.” 
  • Linking these two items in one sentence led us to believe that LDC would use its questionable assessment of parcel of land Burntwood E1 as of only moderate importance to the Green Belt to remove it from the Green Belt. We responded to that consultation, again pointing out the flawed Supplement to the Green Belt Review and stressing the importance which residents of the old Burntwood village attached to the role of that land in maintaining the rural aspect of Burntwood. We also stressed how the surrounding infrastructure would not cope with a large development in the area. 
  • Most of the respondents to that consultation were developers promoting particular sites for housing development. Bloor Homes used the assessment of parcel Burntwood E1 as part of its argument for taking the land between the St Matthews estate and Fulfen School/ Fulfen Farm out of the Green Belt. They provided detailed plans for 80 homes on the St Matthews side of Coulter Lane and 400 homes on the western side. The 80 homes appear in the draft Land Allocations document and the document could try to ‘safeguard’ the land west of Coulter Lane for the 400 homes in the future.

If, like us, you don’t want that to happen join us on 31st January at St Matthews Social Club or indicate your interest by email: [email protected]

www.burntwoodactiongroup.co.uk

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

What the building of houses could do to our local wildlife

In Burntwood alone there is a wide variety of wildlife ranging from badgers to raptors (Birds of prey). The building of these houses would cause a noticeable decline in these species. This is because Burntwood is a prime spot for mammal species to live and create a habitat in. These mammal species would include insectivores like hedgehogs, shrews and moles. But also voles, badgers, red foxes, mice and lagomorphs (hares and rabbits) would be affected. All of these mammals would see a noticeable decline in numbers if the houses are built because of the destruction of their habitat which is fields, woodland as well as your garden environments.

Following this destruction of mammal habitats you would see a significant decline in birds of prey because the fields that harbour these mammals would be lost. These fields are prime hunting grounds for birds of prey, and because their food source would disappear, so would they. Locally the birds of prey would include buzzards, kestrels, tawny owls, barn owls, goshawks and sparrow hawks but you would get many more birds that would be affected like lap wings for example.

I personally have had the privilege of watching kestrels nesting and rearing their young and also seeing the chicks successfully fledge. A lot of the wildlife I have listed is either vulnerable, declining or some endangered and these houses, if built, would be catastrophic to the numbers of these beautiful creatures and it needs to be stopped!

By stopping the houses being built you are helping to keep and conserve the local wildlife and green belt which is really something to be proud of and something that should be treasured for our future generations.

Please take time to view our photos on the website as this beautiful countryside, with all its trees, is what we may lose!

From Charley Scattergood (age 14)

Please support us! (Burntwood Action Group. B.A.G)

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments

Continuing the fight..

The second part of the Local Plan for Lichfield District is known as the “Local Plan Allocations” document. This has revealed that Burntwood and beyond is still under the threat of further development. Information is available on the Lichfield DC website, and the “Call for Sites” lets individuals, organisations and builders suggest sites for development and future adoption.

Details can be found on the links below, which show the areas in question. Primarily we’ve been made aware of plans concerning the land behind Fulfen Primary school on Rugeley Road. This stretches to Coulter Lane, Nether Lane and Church Road. Details of this can be found in this PDF document.

Another area which is declared an “area of interest” is land south of Highfields Road, which is located here. Further details of this plan can be found in this PDF document.

We also have a list of all the proposed Burntwood sites. These can be viewed in this Word document.

NOTE
It is important to note the following comment from the file above…

Changes to the Green Belt boundary will be made to the south of Burntwood to accommodate the residential allocation (Site B14) to assist in meeting the housing requirement for Burntwood.

Changes to the Green Belt boundary will be made to remove the St Matthews estate from the Green Belt, as set out in Policy Burntwood 1: Burntwood Environment (Local Plan Strategy) and accommodate residential allocations (Site B15) to assist in meeting the housing requirement for Burntwood.

We will have more news shortly. Please do head back here for more information.

Posted by Burntwood Action Group in Burntwood Action Group, 0 comments